He writes: "s we embark on this new chapter, Waterfox’s dedication to privacy, customisation, and performance remains. Upcoming versions of the Waterfox browser will have online security and also the digital autonomy of users as a priority. Kontos reiterates that the development focus remains on privacy, customization options and performance. System1 must have had some say in the development of the browser after it made the acquisition, based on that statement. ![]() He mentions that the change allows him and the community to "shape the browser's future direction". Kontos, who remained lead developer of the Waterfox browser after the System1 deal, remains in charge of the independent project. So, five stars of course.On July 3, 2023, Kontos announced on the official Waterfox blog that the browser has turned to its independent roots again. Waterfox did solve (not totally but pretty close) the performance issues that i've been having with firefox and it's as costumizable as the later. It really baffles my mind how does chromium and other engines want to be taken serious with only 4 basic buttons on it's toolbar - it's an insult to any user. So i started to test every other browser i could get my hands on for a week or so ago and it just confirmed that i can't work properly with a browser that, for instance, doesn't let me, fully, natively, and in a simple way, costumize the toolbars. ![]() ![]() Anyway, i've been having problems with very slow or irresponsive firefox. I've been using mozilla/firefox since its inception. Pros: - as good as firefox, with better performance.Ĭons: - still some performance issues in my own setup (it may have to do with the gecko engine, not waterfox's fault).īottom Line: In my own experience and needs of productivity, Firefox's costumization options and overall layout far exceeds its lack of performance in comparison to other browsers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |